AI Search
Classic Search
 Search Phrase:
 Search Type:
Advanced search options
 Search in Forums:
 Search in date period:

 Sort Search Results by:

AI Assistant
Notifications
Clear all

[Closed] Q&A Style: Re-Order answers

3 Posts
3 Users
4 Reactions
2,410 Views
Posts: 2
Topic starter
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
(@gowan-the-bard)
Active Member
Joined: 8 years ago
[#5816]

I have two questions regarding the Q&A layout for WP Foro. 

  1. Is it possible to have answers automatically sort by vote count? 
    1. For example: If Answer 1 has a vote rating of -2, whereas Answer 2 has a vote rating of 6, would it be possible for Answer 2 to display above Answer 1

  2. Is it possible to automatically "sticky" the best answer that the OP chooses, so that the answer is at the top of the list?

Thanks! 


2 Replies
Sofy
Posts: 5774
 Sofy
Admin
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
(@sofy)
Support Team
Joined: 8 years ago

Hi Gamhain,

I'm sorry, but there is no advanced sorting system on wpForo yet. But will take your suggestions under consideration for future releases. 


TIMS Forum
Posts: 46
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
(@tims-forum)
Trusted Member
Joined: 9 years ago

I like this suggestion


Share: