AI Search
Classic Search
 Search Phrase:
 Search Type:
Advanced search options
 Search in Forums:
 Search in date period:

 Sort Search Results by:

AI Assistant
Notifications
Clear all

[Closed] Suggestion for wpForo - CHECK the presence of Caching

2 Posts
2 Users
1 Reactions
1,642 Views
dimalifragis
Posts: 2600
Topic starter
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
(@dimalifragis)
Famed Member
Joined: 6 years ago
[#19151]

Most of the people asking for help here, seems to have some kind of Caching Plugin enabled site-wide. They may have major issues (that are NOT aware, because most don't know where to look) or have "freshness" issues (their forums serve old content).

So it would be nice to check somehow in your Tools or even better during installation/activation, the presence of Caching. Probably you can't cover this 100% but in a big degree to can. The cache file php is in oc-content. Or check the "cache=true" in config of WP. Or other more deep ways to do it, that you devs know.

It is a pitty to see SO MANY wpForo installations running with caching plugins (or server caching) that may cause issues and display problems.

If this check is not possible, you could just WARNING to them that caching AND optimisers (untuned) could lead to issues and problems.


Topic Tags
1 Reply
Robert
Posts: 10753
Admin
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
(@robert)
Support Team
Joined: 3 months ago

Hi @dimalifragis,

Thank you for the suggestion. This is already in the v2.0 to-do list.


Share: